Having read the copyright book assigned for this class I would not agree that the school's use of the name Pooh is a copyright violation.
- The school used the name of this character for a new use. Winnie-the-Pooh is not known for having any type of news reporting nor does he read/write reviews of books.
- The name is being used for educational purposes. The school added this section to their announcements to tell students about different pieces of literature.
- Even though they are not exercising this right in this case, the school has the right to use copyrighted material to enhance curriculum and to sell said curriculum.
- The students are creating new material with their reports and fair use gives them the right to broadcast those new materials.
I tried again to find five reasons I do not think the school violated copyright laws but really I only have three... since one of the listed is not applicable because the school is not using the material in this way. The school refrained from associating their news segment with photos of Winnie-the-Pooh and his voice to avoid direct copyright infringement. They also put the name to a new use. I do not think they violated copyright laws in this case.
(4/4)

